Adapting surveys to the modern world: comparing a researchmessenger design to a regular responsive design for online surveys

Vera Toepoel, Peter Lugtig, Marieke Haan, Bella Struminskaya, Anne Elevelt

Utrecht University, Netherlands, The

Voice Recording in Mobile Web Surveys - Evidence From an Experiment on Open-Ended Responses to the "Final Comment"

Konstantin Leonardo Gavras

University of Mannheim, Germany

How well is remote webcam eye tracking working? - An empirical validation of Sticky and Eyes Decide against Tobii

Michael Wörmann

Facit Digital GmbH, Germany

Using Cash Bonuses for Early Participation to Improve Postal Recruitment of a Probability-Based Online Panel

Barbara Felderer, Ulrich Krieger

SFB 884, University Mannheim

Text Message Invitations as a new way to conduct population wide online surveys? – Biases and Coverage Issues

Christoph Beuthner, Matthias Sand, Henning Silber

GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Participant Recruitment Methods can Affect Research Outcomes: Personality Biases in Different Types of 'Online Sample'.

Tom Buchanan

University of Westminster, United Kingdom

Online, Face-to-Face or Mixed-Mode? Findings from a Methodological Experiment in the GGP Context

Almut Schumann¹, Detlev Lück¹, Robert Naderi¹, Martin Bujard¹, Norbert Schneider¹, Susana Cabaço², Tom Emery², Peter Lugtig³, Vera Toepoel³

1: Federal Institute of Population Reserach (BiB), Germany; 2: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI), Netherlands; 3: Utrecht University, Netherlands

Design and Implementation of a Mixed Mode Time Use Diary in the Age 14 Survey of the Millennium Cohort Study

Emily Gilbert, Lisa Calderwood

University College London, United Kingdom

Understanding mode switching and non-response patterns

Alexandru Cernat

University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Web-push experiment in a mixed-mode probability-based panel survey

David Bretschi, Ines Schaurer

GESIS – Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Push-to-web recruitment of a probability-based online panel: Experimental evidence

Ulrich Krieger¹, Annelies Blom^1,2, Carina Cornesse¹, Barbara Felderer¹, Marina Fikel¹

1: SFB 884, University Mannheim; 2: Department of Political Science, University of Mannheim

Timing your web survey: Effects of variations in time of contact, respondent’s completion behaviour and data quality outcomes in a course evaluation setting

Ellen Laupper, Lars Balzer

Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training SFIVET, Switzerland

How Do Different Device Specifications Affect Data Collection Using Mobile Devices?

Brendan Read

University of Essex, United Kingdom

Does the layout make a difference? An experiment on effects of online survey layout and device on data quality

Ines Schaurer, David Bretschi, Isabella Minderop, Mirjan Schulz

GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Dispelling Smartphone Data Collection Myths: Uptake and Data Quality in the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) Large Random Probability Mixed-Device Online Survey Experiments

Olga Maslovskaya, Gabriele Durrant, Peter WF Smith

University of Southampton, United Kingdom

When Don’t Know is not an Option: The Motivations behind Choosing the Midpoint in Five-Point Likert Type Scales

Johan Martinsson, Elina Lindgren, Sebastian Lundmark

University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Effects of using numeric instead of semantic labels in rating scales

Tobias Gummer, Tanja Kunz

GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Do we know what to do with “Don’t Know”?

Luke Taylor, Tim Hanson, Alice McGee

Kantar Public, United Kingdom

The Presentation of Don't Know Answer Options in Web Surveys: an Experiment with the NatCen Panel

Bernard Steen, Curtis Jessop, Ruxandra Comanaru, Marta Mezzanzanica

NatCen Social Research, United Kingdom

Dynamics and moderators of panel conditioning effects. A meta-analysis.

Tanja Burgard¹, Michael Bosnjak¹, Nadine Kasten²

1: ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information, Germany; 2: University of Trier, Germany

Recalling Survey Answers: A Comparison Across Question Types and Different Levels of Online Panel Experience

Tobias Rettig¹, Jan Karem Höhne^1,2, Annelies Blom¹

1: University of Mannheim; 2: RECSM-Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Looking up the right answer: Errors of optimization when answering political knowledge questions in web surveys

Jan Karem Höhne^1,2, Carina Cornesse¹, Stephan Schlosser³, Mick P. Couper⁴, Annelies Blom¹

1: University of Mannheim, Germany; 2: RECSM-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain; 3: University of Göttingen, Germany; 4: University of Michigan, USA

Context Effects in Online Probing of Sensitive Topics – Explorations Using Survey Data and Paradata

Patricia Hadler

GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Taking Respondents Seriously: Feedback in Mixed-Device Studies

Katharina Meitinger¹, Henning Silber², Jessica Daikeler², Christoph Beuthner²

1: Utrecht University; 2: GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences

List-style open-ended questions in Web surveys: A comparison of three visual layouts

Tanja Kunz¹, Katharina Meitinger²

1: GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: Utrecht University, the Netherlands